Jermall Charlo vs. Austin Trout Scorecard by mike25


scorecard by MIKE25
Round
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Total
JERMALL CHARLO
10
10
10
9
10
9
9
10
9
10
9
10
115
AUSTIN TROUT
9
9
9
10
9
10
10
9
10
9
10
9
113

Fight:



More:

Jermall Charlo

Austin Trout



We do need help growing, please share:

Comments

Champion97's picture

I don't know if you agree but I would love to see Lara vs Trout II, and I don't think Alvarez vs Trout II is a bad match up either.

I would rather see a Trout vs Canelo rematch then Trout vs Lara 2. Not huge on Trout vs Lara 2.

Thoughts on Charlo vs Williams?

Champion97's picture

Fair enough they are both good fights. I'm assuming that's because of the first fight, but there no question that that Austin Trout was not THE Austin Trout, and I just feel he has the beating of Lara in a rematch, it's a 50/50 fight, I think Canelo beats Trout comfortably in a rematch.

It's a good fight, I think Charlo vs Harrison would be a lot better, I think Trout is better than Williams, obviously, that doesn't mean much, because it's not a terrible idea to beat a guy 116-112/115-113, and then fight a guy who merely not as good, I think it's a good fight, but I expect Charlo to stop him, if beat hi comfortably on points.

It looks like Ward vs Kovalev II is happening, an immediate rematch!, should be another great fight, I hope Ward isn't mentally affected by all the s*** he is going to get about 'getting a gift of a decision' he won that fair and square, people are of insufficient perception, and they don't realise it because they don't realise how much there is to boxing, that's not Ward's problem. I think HBO have been awful, it's one thing to have fans who do t really understand boxing criticising a decision, but when you have pundits going in the Internet, and making out like a fighter who won legitimately lost decisively really, is a different thing entirely.

I would pick Trout to lose to Canelo, but I'm not sure how a Lara remtach goes. I would like to see a rematch with Lara if Lara can't get any other good fights, and I think the same for Canelo.

I really like the fight. I think that Williams is an underrated fighter and can give Charlo some problems. In my opinion, I think that it will go the same as the Austin Trout fight. A 116-112 to 115-113 decision.

I heard that a rematch is happening, I can't wait. This is such a worthwhile rematch. I hope it's good as the first one, which I bet it will be. I don't think Ward will be affected at all over this, he's a strong guy he won't let it affect it. Ward did win fair and square in a very close fight. I thought I was the only one that thought HBO did a horrible job overall. It seemed like they were bummed that Kovalev lost and you aren't supposed to be biased. I also thought Ledermans scorecard was way off.

What fights do you recommend that were just added recently? I'm trying to find a good fight.

Champion97's picture

Well I doubt he'll struggle to get good fights, because it is 154.

We'll, I'm going on pretty much his resume alone, I've never seen him fight, I won't argue.

Well you never know, I as a fan am concerned. They were very disappointing indeed. Harold Lederman is a fool, I've learned far, far more about boxing in 6 years than he has in 60, the wrong people having positions in boxing is an issue.

For a start, Walsh vs Appleby, Perez vs Crolla, Buglioni vs Markham, Scott Cardle vs Sean Dodd II, Breazeale vs Kassi, these are some the ones that were just uploaded from my list they are good fights, and they are on Eye on the ring.

True. There's a lot of good fighters at 154.

I only seen him in highlights, he looks solid. This should be a good fight.

To me it looked like they were bummed that Kovalev lost. Who knows? For me, Harold lederman is hit or miss. Sometimes he knows what he's talking about, and then there's sometimes he acts either bias or doesn't know what he's talking about. It seems like sometimes when he's the unofficial scorer he uses his influence as a scorer to make people think a certain fighter is winning. There needs to be more fair and knowledgable people in boxing.

I'll make sure to check out these fights.

Champion97's picture

If you say it should be, I'll expect it to be a good fight.

I don't think that's the answer, maybe a little bit, but more of it is letting bias get the better of them and negate their knowledge. Well to be brutally honest, the fat old grampa is a joke, he is the reason Tim Bradley nearly committed suicide, I'm sure you notice I extremely rarely call boxers names, I give them their die respect, but why should I repsct plastic analysts?, I know more about boxing that Ledsie boy!, he makes out like he knows what he's talking about, and when he gets it right, it's something we all got right. That's it, because, and this makes me very angry, he's official status, everyone on HBO, lampey, good old Kelly, Jones acts like an idiot sometimes, they're all just awful, Lederman, because 'after 60 years following boxing' La De Da De da, don't even get me started on the sith, who's always bullied the best boxer in the world who targeted every day to achieve neanderthal accomplish his dream, whilst old Mercho sits with all the other plebs, it is so wrong that these guys get this position of power and he this high up job when they make a pigs ear of it, they don't deserve. Sorry about that Mike, I've finished my rant. Own more thing about these guys who have belittled Andre Ward's fantastic achievement, HBO must stand for horrible body oder, because they stink.

In this country, Barry Jones, Steve Lilis, Steve Bunce, Johnny Nelson, Paul Smith, all great pundits, over where you are, Paulie Malignaggi, Steve Farhood, Cristina Poncher, Al Bernstein, Stephen A Smith, Bob ? on top rank, many others. We do need more good analysts, I have a vague, not so realistic dream of becoming one one day.

Walsh vs Appleby, you will LOVE! It was awesome, the sportsmanship was lovely, be sure to watch the post fight interviews, and keep an eye out for Liam Walsh, great fighter, closing in on world tile glory if you ask me.

Are you a Claressa Shields fan.

That's the way I see it. HBO promotes some fighters more than others like Pacquiao, Gonzalez, GGG, and Kovalev. Their bias does get in the way of actually being fair. I would say Max Kellerman is pretty knowledgeable out of all of them. When Lederman scores sometimes he has trouble explaining why he gave a round to a fighter. He would be completely off. I remember that he scored Bradley vs Pacquiao very wide and that made people upset because the decision was opposite of what the official judges had. I was never a big fan of Larry Merchant. He always has something negative to say about everyone, he criticized Ward vs Kovalev calling it boring. I don't have a huge problem with Lampley, he always is passionate about his work and stuff. He can be bias from time to time, but I respect him being knowledgeable and passionate. I have HBO but not show time and that's only because showtime had no shows I liked and I liked that HBO had good tv and movie selection and that they have boxing.

I like most of those pundits in Britian. I would also have to add Carl Froch into that as well. I like hearing Showtime and Paulie Malinaggi's commentary as well. They don't show any bias.

I'll have to check that fight out. I'm going to watch that then watch Brezeale vs Kassi.

I am, I respect her skills and olympic accomplishments. I missed her fight on the Ward vs Kovalev undercard.

Champion97's picture

They're all knowledgeable, but they use this in the worst possible way. You're entitled to your own opinion, but Lampley, I mean yeah he's passionate, but what is it he's driven to do, sit there and yap on about a load of nonsense, his commentary is terrible. Every time a HBO 'analyst' tries to take on a real analyst, they get mashed, look want happened with Kellerman and Malignaggi. HBO have battered our opinion that Andre Ward won at the weekend, if I was him, I'd think about never fighting on HBO again, and go to Showtime like Mayweather did. The sith, 'I saw Kovalev win every round, in the first half of the fight, did Ward win every round in the second half? No, plus the knockdown, Sergey clearly won the fight' idiot! 3-6 could have gone either way! I think, may be one of them was sa clear Ward round, and I think it's fair to give Ward every round in the second half of the fight. Lederman gives rounds to fighters for invalid reasons, because he doesn't really know how to score a fight.

I don't, I can't criticise HBO and not include our taties, Jeff Powell, absolute moron, he's just an example, Carl Froch I have to say disappoints me as a pundits sometimes, he knows what he's talking about, and he's earned his right to be someone to listen to, but he can be unprofessional, and I don't think he's quite humble enough to be retried, I think he has at least one more big fight left in him, all this rubbish he's spouting about Golovkin I find irritating, he isn't painting himself in a good light.

Good thinking bud.

So did I, they didn't show it over here, I wouldn't rather have seen her fight than Chilemba and Perez vs Hooker, it was such a shame Perez got robbed like that.